Related Articles:
Activity settings for hot water in SBEM v6
Modelling individual zones to find optimum improvements
Specifying Low Flow showers in the SBEM DHW dialogue can reduce the demand for a DHW system by up to 35%. However, in many cases, low-flow showers and showers employing Waste Water Heat Recovery may not reduce the demand at all.
The SBEM database includes a field representing the Shower Fraction for an Activity (the proportion of hot water demand that is served by showers). This can take a value as high as 0.88 (ie 88% of hot water demand is from showers) or as low as zero. For the majority of activities, the value is zero.
'Low Flow showers' are assumed to have a demand that is 60% that of a 'standard shower' (saving 40%). So when the shower fraction is 0.88, assigning all showers to be low flow will reduce the hot water demand by 40 * 0.88 (35%).
A DHW System will likely serve multiple types of activity so a saving as high as 35% would be unusual, however, activities with a high shower fraction also have a very high demand for hot water so a value close to this is feasible.
Note: that all activities with a shower fraction of 0.88 are 'Changing Room with Showers' activities. All these have an exceptional DHW demand that often skews a BRUKL or EPC calculation. Employing low-flow technology in such buildings may well significantly reduce ratings / BER.
Most activities have a shower fraction of zero so won't benefit from specifying low flow showers. However, there are other activities with a non zero shower fraction (0.7 or 0.12). These are listed below:
The following activities have a shower fraction of 0.7. DHW systems supplying these could have a reduced demand of 28% with all low flow showers.
The following activities have a shower fraction of 0.12. DHW systems supplying these could have a reduced demand of 5% with only low-flow showers.
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article